The Lansing Bubble Cadre

 

The "Lansing Bubble Cadre" of corruptors enact statutory provisions that enables the very corruption that they loudly proclaim does not exist.

One such "Fiction of Law" which is a falsity presumed to be true, albeit to advance devious means as a lawful act is the "Rebuttal Presumption".

In this instance, the Fiction of Law was issued by the Bureau of Elections as a Staff Report to deny Ballot Access to a proposal that would terminate the unlawful hold upon Michigan's Public Trust by the corrupted "Lansing Bubble Cadre".

"Cadre": a group of people having some unifying relationship.

What Unifies the "Lansing Bubble Cadre"? Absolute control of the "Legislative Plunder" of 1.73 trillion dollars redistributed amongst their favorites as the Annual State Budget since the Fiscal Year of October 1, 1995.

What do the corrupted "Lansing Bubble Cadre" FEAR? A Voting Law that expressly Limits Ballot access to United States Citizens.

Why do the "Lansing Bubble Cadre" fear Lawful Elections? Well, how about having to get a real job, where the Cadre would have to produce lawful results.

So how does the “Lansing Bubble Cadre” “assure” their corrupted hold on Michigan’s Public Trust?

Well, look no further than the Michigan Department of Secretary of State’s Bureau of Elections.

Déjà vu moved by Michigan’s Elected and Appointed Appratchiks standing the falsity of their Public Policy known as the “Rule by Law. . . “

 There is no authority in Michigan Law to validate a statistical sample as a validation standard of a Petition addressing the Signature requirement for Ballot Access.

The State Board of Canvassers’ Secretary (Jonathan Brater) submitted the ‘Staff Report’ issued on March 4, 2026, (MCL 168.552(10) which embodies the ‘Statistical Sample’ to ‘evidence’ the denial of the Petition as to the validity of the signatories standing as Qualified Voters.

The State Board of Canvassers’ Statistical Denial’ is a false allegation presented as a ‘rebuttal presumption’.

This bureaucratic rule is known as Lies, Dammed Lies and STATISTICS . . . 

This is the Marxist nexus of the SOS ‘public policy’ known as ‘Rule by Law’. This ‘Rule by Law’ is Bureaucratic Socialism that is enabled administratively as the ‘rebuttable presumption’. MCL168.552(13). In short, a falsity, that is presumed to be true. 

The ‘rebuttable presumption’ is the enforcement policy enabled by the colorful use of (MCL 168.10) moved as a Staff Report (MCL 168.476{3}) addressing the ‘Qualified Voter’ status of the signatory. 

This unofficial staff report is then ‘certified’ by the Board’s vote under MCL 168.552(11). In this instance by a ‘tied vote’ of the Board.

That is the March 4, 2026, Letter that presumptively declared that a 750 sample Register Voter signatures invalidated your petitions.

Note this Staff Report is not an official OMB form.

In fact, this ‘Denial Letter’ is not certified evidence presented to the Board.

This is why the Denial Letter sits as a rebuttable presumption.

The Staff Report Denial Notice was predicated upon a ‘legal fiction’ known on the street as the ‘Big Lie’.

In our opinion a Writ of Mandamus instructing the board to produce hard evidentiary copies of the invalid 263,645 or more of lawfully substantiated invalidated signatories wherein failure to present same substantiates the Petition’s standing to be on the Ballot.

The Bureau of Elections will not be able to substantiate its ‘rebuttal presumption’ of Denial.

Given the judicial arrogance moved by the Michigan Court of Appeals addressing Ralph Rembrandt’s challenge to the ‘Staff Report’ moving into the US District Court with a Writ of Mandamus addressing ministerial duties (rule by law) by requesting an expedited Docket, FRCP 26 and associated local rule of the Court is a valid option.

Why a Writ of Mandamus in the Federal Judicial arena?

Well, the March 4, 2026, Staff Report alongside the July 24 2026 ‘Challenge Deadline’ notification are ‘Fictions of Law’.

Fictions of law are not a lawful execution of a ‘Ministerial Duty’.

Say What?

‘In the sense of a fiction of law, a contrived condition or situation: The simulation of a Status or condition with the purpose of accomplishing justice, albeit a justice reached by devious means.” Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, Third Edition, page 468

One does not appeal a ‘Falsity’.

One ‘Mandates’ the Truth.

The actions of the SOS in this instance directly violate the ‘Rule of Law’.

This intentional unlawful action couched as a Staff Report directly denies 709,841 Michiganders their First Amendment US of A Constitutional Right, inclusive of Article I sec 3 of the Michigan State Constitution of 1963, standing to Petition their Grievances.

Rule by Law verse Rule of Law is a Federal question reference Title 28 USC § 1257 and or Title 28 USC § 1331

A rebuttal presumption is not lawful evidence.

In this instance it is a devious ruse moved to perfect a statistical falsity.

This is a systemic fraud standing as ‘Rule by Law’ which needs to be lawfully addressed.

How was the falsity adapted as a ‘lawful denial’.

Simple the Board’s Secretary Jonathan Brater submitted an unofficial report, the Staff Report dated March 4, 2026.

This ‘Staff Report’ is a ‘rebuttal presumption’ that is issued as a ‘Denial Letter’ moved as the falsity to stipulate that 709,841 Michiganders Constitutional standing to Petition their Grievances is null and void.

Unbelievable eh!

This ‘Staff Report’s Letter was colorfully addressed as ‘valid’ by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers on July 24th, 2026 addressing a ‘Challenge Deadline’.

Welcome to the Mad Lands of Bureaucratic Socialism where the Public Actors perfect their Public Policy Falsity within the unconstitutionally imposed ‘Rule by Law’ under a State Gaveled Judicial Decree.

Maddening Eh!