Saturday, February 27, 2010

Defunding the Progressive Welfare State


We have one choice, stand up and take back our State and Federal Legislatures from the hands of the progressive elements that control both major political parties, or discover the true meaning of suffering the insufferable.

The Progressive political class knows well the current abomination implemented as the State and Federal Tax programs have become a morass administered corruptly under the color of law.

Unfortunately the Michigan Fair Tax Promoters have no comprehension to the history of the “income tax”, and other progressive fiscal (tax) programs that were implemented, not to fund the administrative welfare state, but to turn honest hardworking American State Citizens into controllable social resources.

The Michigan Fair Tax itself is predicated on first increasing the cost of small business and large business operations by increasing the “sales and use tax” about 3.75%. This fact alone is detrimental for it decreases the consumption of goods, by increasing the cost to the purchaser. Where in the State or Federal Constitution is the authority for the legislature to tax the private transaction between a seller and a purchaser? What empowers the State or the Federal Legislature to excise private transactions? Contrary to Michigan Fair Tax promoters there was no such thing as a sales tax imposed anywhere in America Prior to July 1, 1921. It was on this date, that the first retail sales tax in America was imposed by a State, and of all places, it was “by God West Virginia.” Ad Valorem Taxes prior to that date, were state and federal legislatively enacted excise taxes which are indirect taxes, imposed upon the manufacturer of goods. The Federal Legislature also imposed duties, and tariffs at the port of entry on goods which was part I of the Tariff Act of October 3, 1913. Part II of that Tariff Act expanded the Corporate Excise Tax of 1909 to include excising the accretion of wealth distributed by Persons, like the Union Pacific Railroad to a statutorily defined individual such as Frank Brushaber.

Retail consumption Taxes are a gross receipts tax, which is defined in Title 4 USCA Chapter 4 § 110c as an “INCOME TAX”. So it is very apparent the Fair Tax Promoters throughout America are promoting an income tax, yet claim it is a sales tax. Welcome to Alice’s Wonderland, where nothing is as others portend it may be.

If is unfortunate that the Fair Tax Promoters here in Michigan and throughout America have failed to comprehend the consequences of targeting a specific class of Americans, who unfortunately listened to a Publically Certified Account, and or dues paying members of the self funded component (State Bar Association) unit of State Government, and secured a statutory charter from the State and or Federal Authorities.

The State and or Federal Legislature may only regulate creatures of their Creation. A state and or federal legislature imposes regulation under its fiscal programs, for regardless of the oblique references to the “commerce cause” championed by the statutory creation of the Federal Legislature, the Supreme Court of the United States, all administrative regulation rides on the back side of fiscal programs.

IN the American Republic, the fundamental Law states clearly:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Why would an American State Citizen elect anyone that promised to continue the tax and spending programs under the false promise of enacting a “Fair Tax”?

Governmental expenditures here in Michigan, just at the State Level consumes 40 plus billion dollars year, since 2004. In fact the State Legislature here in Michigan has increased taxes across the spectrum which empowers an administrative welfare state spending program that knows no bounds.

This increase in the State Sales Tax, as promoted under the Fair Tax promoters here in Michigan, and other similar programs promoted throughout the other 49 State of America, fails to address the systemic fiscal problem; the ever growing permanence of the administrative welfare state’s appointed political bureaucracy. A State’s appointed civil bureaucracy consumes nearly 78 percent of every budgetary tax dollar for working capital, with the residual covering legacy costs such as legislatively enacted pension programs, and the ongoing funding of such administrative operations as the Women and Infant Children Program and the indoctrination centers known as “Public Schools”.

The Federal administrative oversight of the Michigan State Legislature’s enacted Welfare Programs moves under the Income Tax Act of 1935, as Amended in 1939, known as “Social Security”. Here in Michigan the administrative welfare state moves under two public acts dating back from the heady days of the Progressive Program, known as the New Deal, Public Act I of 1936, and Public Act 280 of 1939.

The actuarial cost of these statutorily enacted administrative programs when first implemented in the late 1930’s, were predicated on the known fact that the average American male died in his mid fifties and the average American Woman died in her late fifties, and that the “tax benefit” called social security kicked in at 65 years of Age. Otto Von Bismarck was said to have stated boldly in his day back in 1881, we will provide them with “social security” at 65 if they LIVE THAT LONG!

The fiscal goal of the Fair Tax Promoters here in Michigan and throughout America is to continue funding the ever growing administrative welfare state, by moving the tax burden upon chartered state and federal businesses transacting retails sales to State Citizens. The Fair Tax Promoters here in Michigan and throughout America are promoting a false flag event. This Fair Tax program is not about reform; it is all about the Progressive elements of both National Political Parties moving behind what Vladimir Ulyanov, known to history as Nicolai Lenin, referred to as “useful idiots” to maintain their control of fiscal programs at the State and Federal level.

The Fair Tax Promoters are promoting an opiate, which has been nurtured by the Progressives, for the program as promoted here in Michigan ladles out “tax refunds” to the “consumer” predicated upon a federally determined analysis known as the “Poverty Level”. Why would any one American State Citizen support a fiscal program that is predicated upon poverty? Whatever happened to the fundamental principles of securing Life, liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness? The so called “tax rebates” are predicated upon the mistaken belief, that the State legislature will not continue expanding its tax and spend programs known as the administrative welfare state.

Not one Fair Tax promoter here in Michigan or elsewhere in America addresses the real problem; the progressive usurpation of Constitutional limitations by the State and Federal Legislature to expand Theodore Roosevelt’s original Progressive promotion known to history as the “Square Deal”. We now this day in Michigan and throughout America suffer the insufferable for we, our fathers, and now our Children are being indoctrinated in governmentally controlled “educational centers” to swill the false belief in civil rights. “Civil Rights are a statutorily enacted program of the State and Federal Legislature that moves in defiance to the Fundamental Law of the American Republic.

In order to fund this legal fiction of legislatively created (civil rights) benefits, the Progressives moving within both National Political Parties, need a new name to fund the same ole game, enter the “Fair Tax”!

Why would any one Michigan State Citizen support a program that puts them directly under the statutory thumb of the fiscal will and whim of the State Legislature, which subsequently supports the ever growing presence of the administrative welfare state’s appointed political bureaucracy?

The promoters of the Michigan Fair Tax are enabling this ongoing administrative folly, by changing the name of income taxation, with no concern to correct the underlying political problem, which is the administrative welfare state of National Socialism, which has been the goal of the Progressives since the days of Theodore Roosevelt’s “Square Deal”.

The concept of imposing consumption taxes at the retail level, is unconscionable, and in the private nature of business, an unconstitutional application of State and Federal fiscal policy. Any business that registers with the State or Federal Authority, as a chartered corporate entity will fall within the statutory reach of the tax and spenders squandering our Wealth from under the State and Federal Capitol Dome. Let these creatures of the State and Federal Legislature pay their “fair share” alone, and watch how quickly the administrative welfare state will collapse when it drives its taxpayer to financial ruin.

The closure of the Progressive creation, the administrative welfare state should be the paramount issue, not looking for a new name, the Fair Tax, to fund the same old political morass.

We here in Michigan have a choice, wake up to the folly of the Progressive Political class’s fiscal policies which are moved under the Fair Tax, the Flat Tax, and or the National Sales Tax promotions, or continue to suffer the insufferable systemic fraud of the administrative welfare state clothed comfortably under the color of Constitutional law.

What few American State Citizens understand is the Pollack Decision of 1895 stated taxes imposed upon rights to property have to be apportioned. The Brushaber Decision of 1916 acknowledged that the “16th Amendment did not change, expand, or in any way alter the constitutional limitation imposed upon the United States of America in Congress Assembled when imposing taxes directly upon the property of American State Citizens. Read Article I § 3, and Article I § 9(4).

So after over 110 years of the Progressive Political Class’s systemic fraud imposed as the administrative welfare state, here we stand today, where unfortunately, there are American State Citizens, here in Michigan and throughout our Great Republic whose collective dysfunctional literacy to the history of the American Republic encourages them to promote a new name for funding the systemic fraud of the State and Federal Government’s fiscal policies.

We as Michigan State Citizens, along with our fellow State Citizens in the other 49 Sovereign and Independent States of the American Republic have a duty to ourselves and our progeny to stand up against this false flag promotion presented as the Fair Tax, by helping those deceived promoters to awaken to the Constitutional Fact, that our State and Federal legislature are creatures of Constitutional limitation, not ever expanding fiscal black holes of statutory corruption.


"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands, which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
- Samuel Adams, speech at the Philadelphia
State House, August 1, 1776

Saturday, February 6, 2010

State’s Rights


He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.



The governmentally controlled schools no longer teach the history of the American Republic. Those who have no knowledge of what inspired our Founding Fathers to battle the administrative tyranny of the Britannic Majesty and his governmentally empowered ministers will not comprehend the State and Federal Political Class’s constitutional deceit.

The thirteen united Colonies of America unilaterally declared their united independence on July 4th, 1776 as the thirteen united States of America.

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation

The thirteen united States of America sent representatives to sit in a Second Continental Congress during the Revolutionary (Civil War) Era during the eight years of armed rebellion for Independence against the British Crown.

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was presented to the States in the fall of 1777 by the Second Continental Congress, and adopted when the thirteenth State, Maryland ratified the document on or about March 1st of 1781.

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union established an American Confederation of Sovereign and Independent States to be styled the United States of America. This Constitutional fact is articulated in Article II:

Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual was amended by adoption of the Constitution of the United States for the United States of America, which was the result of the Constitutional Convention that sat in Philadelphia from May to September of 1787. The amending document titled the Constitution of the United States for the United States of America contains Article IV and the 10th Amendment, which constitutionally substantiate the status of the Sovereign, and Independent States of the more perfect Union, which is known to this day as the Confederation of the United States of America.

The historical fact of Constitutional continuity is no longer taught in American History. The Constitution of the United States amended the powers of the Federal Government and did not diminish the authority of the States. The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union established a body politic known as the United States. The United States is to this day, the administrative hand of the United States of America in Congress Assembled.

Under the Amended document titled the Constitution of the United States for the United States of America, the Federal government was given a limited power of the purse as found in Article I § 2, § 8 and § 9.

The Federal government, which is the United States,  is an administrative bureaucracy funded annually by the United States of America in Congress Assembled.  Congress's legisaltive reach is Constitionally limited in accordance to Article I § 8 cls. 1-18, and Article IV.

Unfortunately, the State political class that sits under the State’s Capitol Dome has enacted State law, Federally defined as the State Plan, which has empowered the reach of the Federal Government to move within the exterior boundaries of the OUR Sovereign and Independent State.

What few Americans comprehend, is the Constitutional fact that without the compliant hand of the State Legislature enacting what is Federally defined as the State Plan, the Federal Legilative with its attendant bureaucrats stops at the State’s exterior Border.

Americans have been deliberately misled by the State and Federal Political Class, who have conspired together to trample our State’s Sovereignty and Independence by imposing tax and spend programs for the past Seventy Six years, which empowered the administrative reach of Federal bureaucrats under such innocuous programs as the “Family Independence Agency”.

The New Committees of Correspondence

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating
contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms.
Crouch down and lick the hands, which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you,
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
Samuel Adams, speech at the Philadelphia
State House, August 1, 1776

The Tea Party Protests that literally erupted in February of 2009, culminating in a Nation Wide Action on April 15th, 2009 arose in a political vacuum.  This political vacuum represents the American electorates’ awakening to the systemic fraud that permeates the two National Political Parties that control the State and Federal Legislatures.

The spontaneous grassroots revolt known as the “Tea Parties” is the largest non-controlled political response in America since the days of the Granger protests that challenged the political class in the late 1870’s.

The Granger Protests were eventually co-opted by the political class under the “populist” banner, which led to the collectivist movement championed by Theodore Roosevelt in the 1890’s known as the Progressive movement.


Today the Progressive Political class that sits within the shadows of the State and the Federal Capitol Domes care for nothing except how they may maintain their legislative and Political Party control at the State and Federal level.

The Grassroots and Teaparty Activists moved the largest political upset in a generation on the First Tuesday of November in 2010 throughout the United States of America.  The Progressives responded to this political loss by hitting the ground running with a choreographed media blitz wrapped around the Big Lie.

The Progressives are an entrenched political ideology of yesteryear that has shown these past three years that they will continue to swing widely whilst failing to grasp that are they are the wounded animal backed into a corner with nowhere to go.

The last bastion of the Progressives is their political influence within State and National Political Committees. 

The Grassroots and Teaparty Activists here in Michigan have proven this last bastion of the Progressive is surmountable, the State and National political Party.    The Grassroots and Teaparty Activists started at the local Precinct level, and managed in just three years to change the fact of the Michigan GOP by putting it back on the road to Conservative Principles.

There will always be the Progressive holdout, such as what is occurring in Oakland County in the 11th Congressional District in response to the complete collapse of the old guard Progressive favorite Republican In Name Only, Thaddeus McCotter this past May 2012.

The Grassroots and Teaparty activists are in the midst of a political war, wherein the Progressives will do whatever it takes to maintain their dominating influence within the Party Committees and Governmental structures.

The political upheaval in the 11th Congressional District here in Michigan will become a learning experience, where the Grassroots and Teaparty activists will discover why the wounded Progressive political apparatchiks will never just fade away.

We need to remind ourselves, and our neighbors that OUR rights come from God, not some sanctimonious Federal or State Progressive apparatchik granting a statutory privilege couched as civil rights, entitlements or political offices.

Liberty is easily lost, and hard to regain.  Yet here in Michigan, the Grassroots and Teaparty Activists are coming together as a Beacon of Liberty  for others to see, what shall be accomplished when God fearing Citizens stand together to overcome the Progressive albatross.

"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right, from the frame of their nature, to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers."
-- John Adams (Dissertation on Canon and Feudal Law, 1765)
Reference: Our Sacred Honor, Bennett, 253.

Awaken the Republic

The American Republic is alive and well, once you learn how to keep it that way

"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right, from the frame of their nature, to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers."
-- John Adams (Dissertation on Canon and Feudal Law, 1765)
Reference: Our Sacred Honor, Bennett, 253.


The American Republic has been subverted by the Collectivist ideology of National Socialism. The Collectivist’s ideology presented to Americans under the “progressive” mantra introduced by Theodore Roosevelt in the early days of his accidental ascendency to the Office of the President of the United States in 1901.

Theodore Roosevelt embraced the collectivist ideology of progressionism, which is to this day, the governmental program of expanding the administrative state at a dear cost to our Singular Liberties as endowed by nature’s God.

The ever-expanding reach of the State polity, challenged by Englishman dating from the Magna Carta wherein the “evil” Prince John appended his regal signature to a statutory document that for the first time limited the reach of the political state in modern western history.

The Magna Carta was signed on June 12th, 1215 under the Oak Tree at Runnymede.


Preamble: John, by the grace of God, king of England, lord of Ireland, duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and count of Anjou, to the archbishop, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justiciaries, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his bailiffs and liege subjects, greetings. Know that, having regard to God and for the salvation of our soul, and those of all our ancestors and heirs, and unto the honor of God and the advancement of his holy Church and for the rectifying of our realm, we have granted as underwritten by advice of our venerable fathers, Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry, archbishop of Dublin, William of London, Peter of Winchester, Jocelyn of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh of Lincoln, Walter of Worcester, William of Coventry, Benedict of Rochester, bishops; of Master Pandulf, subdeacon and member of the household of our lord the Pope, of brother Aymeric (master of the Knights of the Temple in England), and of the illustrious men William Marshal, earl of Pembroke, William, earl of Salisbury, William, earl of Warenne, William, earl of Arundel, Alan of Galloway (constable of Scotland), Waren Fitz Gerold, Peter Fitz Herbert, Hubert De Burgh (seneschal of Poitou), Hugh de Neville, Matthew Fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip d'Aubigny, Robert of Roppesley, John Marshal, John Fitz Hugh, and others, our liegemen.

1. In the first place we have granted to God, and by this our present charter confirmed for us and our heirs forever that the English Church shall be free, and shall have her rights entire, and her liberties inviolate; and we will that it be thus observed; which is apparent from this that the freedom of elections, which is reckoned most important and very essential to the English Church, we, of our pure and unconstrained will, did grant, and did by our charter confirm and did obtain the ratification of the same from our lord, Pope Innocent III, before the quarrel arose between us and our barons: and this we will observe, and our will is that it be observed in good faith by our heirs forever. We have also granted to all freemen of our kingdom, for us and our heirs forever, all the underwritten liberties, to be had and held by them and their heirs, of us and our heirs forever.


The King’s of England would tolerate this statutory provision with great reluctance. Four Hundred years later, in 1689, a historical period known as the Glorious Revolution, the Parliament of England overthrew James II, and appointed William of Orange to the throne, once he accepted the English Bill of Rights of 1689. The English bill of Rights of 1689, once again statutorized the limitations of the governmental Polity.

An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown
Whereas the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster, lawfully, fully and freely representing all the estates of the people of this realm, did upon the thirteenth day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty-eight [old style date] present unto their Majesties, then called and known by the names and style of William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, being present in their proper persons, a certain declaration in writing made by the said Lords and Commons in the words following, viz.:
Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;

By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament;

Less than eighty years later, the American Colonies, populated by Englishman were suffering the insufferable reach of the governmental polity sitting in London. A governmental polity that imposed its political will regardless of the protestations moved by his Britannic Majesty’s loyal subjects in the American Colonies sitting along the western shores of the Atlantic.

So, once again, Englishman stood forth to officially protest a governmental polity that for all intense and purposes was moving under the arbitrary will of public ministers without concern to the deprivations suffered by inhabitants.

Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress
OCTOBER 14, 1774

Whereas, since the close of the last war, the British parliament, claiming a power, of right, to bind the people of America by statutes in all cases whatsoever, hath, in some acts, expressly imposed taxes on them, and in others, under various presences, but in fact for the purpose of raising a revenue, hath imposed rates and duties payable in these colonies, established a board of commissioners, with unconstitutional powers, and extended the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty, not only for collecting the said duties, but for the trial of causes merely arising within the body of a county:
And whereas, in consequence of other statutes, judges, who before held only estates at will in their offices, have been made dependant on the crown alone for their salaries, and standing armies kept in times of peace: And whereas it has lately been resolved in parliament, that by force of a statute, made in the thirty-fifth year of the reign of King Henry the Eighth, colonists may be transported to England, and tried there upon accusations for treasons and misprisions, or concealments of treasons committed in the colonies, and by a late statute, such trials have been directed in cases therein mentioned:

Unfortunately, his Britannic Majesty King George III, and his ministers sitting upon the Privy Council continued their administrative plundering of the American Colonies’ liberties. There were voices in Parliament that spoke up from the floor of Parliament on behalf of the American colonies, but those voices were at first ignored.

In the spring of 1775, British General Thomas Gage sitting at his command in Boston, sent out 700 soldiers to confiscate guns and ammunition the American colonists had stored in the town of Concord, just outside of the City. This was on April 19th, 1775, wherein English Men, under the smoke of fired Muskets first stood as Americans on the Lexington Green, to stop what they recognized as the corrupted acts of the King and his ministers.

Over the next 16th months, the United Colonies of America attempted to settle this civil dispute to no avail with the King and his Ministers. Finally, the Thirteen United Colonies of America took the unprecedented step and issued the Unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united State of America on July 4th, 1776:

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.


During the pendency of this civil war, the Continental Congress set as the unified voice of the thirteen united States of America. Under this authority, the Continental Congress submitted to the States for ratifications the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, which was unanimously adopted when Maryland became the final state granting its consent in March of 1781.


The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union constitutionally constituted a confederation known as the United States of America.

To all to whom these Presents shall come, we the undersigned Delegates of the States affixed to our Names send greeting.
Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the states of New Hampshire, Massachusetts-bay Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.
I.
The Stile of this Confederacy shall be

"The United States of America".

II.
Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

III.
The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever.

IV.
The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions, and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any State, to any other State, of which the owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the property of the United States, or either of them.


The United States was empowered to be the Agency of the United States of America. This agency ran afoul of poor finances during the pendency of the “Revolutionary” War, wherein by the mid 1780’s bankruptcy loomed, for the United State had no revenue sources of its own. The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union left the United States dependent upon the good will of the States for its fiscal standing.

The Annapolis Convention issued a call for a Constitutional Convention to amend the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. The Convention was to be held in the spring of 1787 in Philadelphia.

The result of the Convention in Philadelphia was the presentment to the United States of America, the Constitution of the United States on September 17th, 1787. Over the coming months, a continental debate arose over the changes that would result under the adoption of this Constitution of the United States for the United States of America. One source of the debates is s the Federalist Papers. The Federalist Papers were a series of commentaries apparently written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. These commentaries about the adoption of the Constitution of the United States appeared in the News Papers of the day debating the pros and cons of adopting this Constitution for the United States of America.

One result of the political debate about the Ratification of the Constitution of the United States for the United States of America was the adoption of the first ten amendments, which are to this day, known as the “Bill of Rights”. The first ten amendments were reminiscent of the English Bill of Rights When one reads these two documents, they will readily recognize that both statutory acts imposed a constitutional limitation upon the reach of the governmental ministry.
Bill of Rights

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.


It is unfortunate that we here in America this day suffer the insufferable ministration of a collectivist system of governance. We live in an America where the elected political class willingly tramples its known constitutional imitations, which improperly empowers their appointed political bureaucrats’ imposition of a “public policy”

This arrogance of constitutional usurpation by the public actors that sit under the State and Federal Capitol Dome, is a direct result of over 109 years of progressive politics, which is the collectivist ideal of National Socialism.

This collectivist governance is dependent upon its administrative control of the educational system. The collectivist educational system has willingly and intentionally failed to properly address the history of America in the classroom at any level of the publicly controlled education process.

In fact the collectivist, have promoted the dystopian ideology of progressionism, which empowers an administrative state populated by appointed political bureaucrats whose concern is the thirty-first year when the Pension kicks in.

This deliberated failure to share the richness of America’s history in the governmentally controlled education system has empowered a dysfunctional understanding as to the constitutionally constituted limitation of the elected and appointed political bureaucrats that sit in the offices of the public trust at the State and Federal Level.

We need to reign in the political malfeasance of the elected and appointed political bureaucracy by learning how to constitutionally curtail their improper usage of the administrative authority. The collectivist state of administrative authority knowingly imposes a system of legislative plunder that lies in equity in defiance to constitutional law.

This system of legislative plunder lies well in equity, as the politically elected and appointed bureaucracy know well there is no constitutional lawfulness that authenticates their legislative largess.

We have one choice here in America, and that is to awaken from over one hundred years of historical slumber, and learn how to substantiate our liberties as endowed by Nature’s God. We need to let the elected officials, who populate the state and federal legislatures, know that America is a Constitutional Republic and not the democracy that they claim it may be